Quote:
Originally Posted by Sezzy
I have held my tongue whilst reading this thread, read the rhetoric and standard 'nanny state' comments and up until that point, discussion was well founded and rational.
My mother always brought me up to question things -authority, standard opinion...anything I wanted...so I shall question this (and no doubt wait for the barage of asinine 'troll' comments that follow)...what gives anyone the right to put someone elses safety in danger, on the roads or anywhere else? The law was put there for a reason whether you like it or not...unless you're an engineer who sets these limitations, who are you to say you should be able to do 120 un a 100 zone? I don't like many of the rules we have in Australia, but that certainly doesn't give me the 'right' to break them...
|
I agree with you trying this thought process, however I think that it is naive. We all put each others lives in danger when we travel. Whether we are obeying the speed limit or not. Two cars traveling in opposite directions at 100km/h is a very dangerous situation, and mistakes occur. It is a biological fact - we as living creatures make mistakes. whether intentional or not. If you really wanted to push the ultimate safety weapon, all cars should be limited to 40km/h by law, and anyone exceeding the law just once should be imprisoned because they put someone elses life/child/wife/baby whatever emotive picture you can imagine, in danger, with fatal possible consequences. Think all the way through your argument and this is the ultimate conclusion.
__________________
XA coupe 8.8sec @ 150mph
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...coupe+drag+car
BA GT-P for the shed
Mustang GT for the other half
E3 chubsport - fully fat (and slow), sitting there waiting for me to get sick of it and sell it.
BA XR6T for a daily
NT Pajero for the bush
XB 4 door project- swallows a BF xr6 turbo
My dad is a generous bloke. He gave away his dead car batteries free of charge....