Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > OzECruisers (E/N/D Series) > OzECruisers General Discussions

OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2005, 01:50 PM   #1
XRated
Shoot.
 
XRated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,909
Question Steps to improving fuel economy

As most of us know, the fuel consumption in the 4.0L I6s isn't the greatest in stock guise. However, I've noticed quite a few people have higher than average fuel consumption, myself included.

What I want to know, is what things people should be checking/replacing/fixing to try and improve their fuel economy, and what should be done first (ie. in order of cheapest & easiest, to more expensive & harder). For example, a simple check might be basic service items such as air filter, plugs and leads, compared to changing something like the O2 sensor or going as far as "a manual is much more efficient than the equivalent auto" or "get a custom tuned chip to adjust Air:Fuel ratios" etc.

Of course we have to consider that some people are a bit more "spirited" in their driving and/or do lots of city driving, so I don't expect miracles!

Mine is currently 17.7L/100km :O I am trying to get that down back into the low 14s like it once was. I know someone (with a Brock?) on the forums has a very low consumption per 100km (11L/100km I think).

Currently: ED 4.0L I6, 4 speed auto, regular unleaded, with the occassional tank of premium, 1004 114 Wade cam, 3.08 diff.

Cheers
__________________


20V Turbo

XRated is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 01:54 PM   #2
niko
likes falcon's
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
Default

its called getting a manual 4cylendar 1.8litre lol

i have a mate with same setup but ef, with a el 5speed @ 100k's revs at 1650 lol! not taking it easy the whole time gets him 550 out of a tank? average of around 9/100
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au

Last edited by niko; 01-06-2005 at 01:55 PM.
niko is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:00 PM   #3
Sundeep
Banned
 
Sundeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Eastern Subs.
Posts: 2,281
Default

I went ape shit on my old car, in the end I converted to gas. You can't win!

I'd start with the following though;

-Rotor button, dizzy cap, leads, plugs.
-Air filter.
-Fuel filter.
-Test fuel pressure regulator.
-Test injectors to see if they are leaking.

I'd also be doing a fault test to see if any of the sensors are playing up. The most common ones to fail, resulting in bad fuel economy, are the Coolant Temp Sensor (CTS/ECT), MAP sensor, Air Charge Temp (ACT), o2 and TPS. The fault test isn't too hard to do, and it could bring up some surprises!

/gayness :P

Sundeep
Sundeep is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:05 PM   #4
XRated
Shoot.
 
XRated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,909
Default

Hahaha gayness.

Cheers Sunny. I've got a new rotor button somewhere, and I am getting a new dizzy cap, leads, air filter and plugs soon. Also going to attempt to replace the fuel filter..

BTW, on the trip computer I get the figures per 100km, but on my odometer, a full tank will [with luck] get 350kms these days (450kms months ago wasn't unheard of :P).
__________________


20V Turbo


Last edited by XRated; 01-06-2005 at 02:06 PM.
XRated is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:08 PM   #5
Sundeep
Banned
 
Sundeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Eastern Subs.
Posts: 2,281
Default

Yeah and the fault finding test stuff can be found in your Gregory's manual. All you need is a test light and some terminals, it's harder in the ED's than EA because of those tiny *** terminals.

I payed about $60 for plugs, Champion 8mm leads, rotor button, cap and NGK-R plugs for the EL. It made SFA difference to idle which I was hoping it would cure, but it made a noticeable difference to the fuel economy although it wasn't much.

/gayness.

Sundeep
Sundeep is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:19 PM   #6
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
Default

Well I haven't touched my car other than the exhaust, and I get 450 minuim a tank. This is mainly driving through Geelong peak hour after work (dont laugh it does get pretty busy, stupid trucks!).

What I find kills fuel economy is take off. Just take it easy, espically when in heavy traffic as your not going anywhere in a hurry anyway.

Also another little "trick" is when going down a long steepish hill just put the clutch in and roll as much as possible.

Little things I know, but it adds up.
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 03:17 PM   #7
stockstandard
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Also another little "trick" is when going down a long steepish hill just put the clutch in and roll as much as possible.
lol - Mexican overdrive. Good in manual, bad in auto.

I get 14-15L/100k's and 400-500k's out of a tank. 5 speed and 3.08 diff helps. And now that my "spirited" driving has been replaced with "lets not wake the baby up" driving it should get a lot better.

When it comes to fuel economy the first step is to make sure everything is working right. As metioned above - plugs, leads, filters, are all good. Checking the computer for errors is good to. And making sure the car is regularly serviced - good engine oil, trans fluid, timing properly set, etc.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper
Yeah, the car is ugly, I can live with that.
stockstandard is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:49 PM   #8
niko
likes falcon's
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
Default

i think there legality issues regarding rolling in neutral but meh who cares
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au
niko is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 03:11 PM   #9
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by niko
i think there legality issues regarding rolling in neutral but meh who cares
thats the craziest thing ive ever heard! Technically im still in gear, its just not engaged..lol
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:50 PM   #10
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

Dont drive around town in peak hour traffic, i used to get 18L/100ks - since moving to narre warren I am getting about 500 out of tank, so something like 13L/100k's , have also put in a new fuel filter.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 02:55 PM   #11
TUFED6
Banned
 
TUFED6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: \x/estside, Melbourne
Posts: 557
Default

My car has had amazing fuel consumption since 3rd gear went bang.

- John
TUFED6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 03:13 PM   #12
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

using neutral in an auto is not supposed to be legal, yet i think it was today tonight promoted it as a way to save fuel.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 04:31 PM   #13
ilsautomotive
Former E-Series Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,733
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dellboy999
using neutral in an auto is not supposed to be legal, yet i think it was today tonight promoted it as a way to save fuel.
That's a worry, having an auto in neutral for extended periods while the car is rolling would kill it pretty fast from what has been described to me. It creates extra heat because the trans fluid isn't circulating properly or something.

The best driving tip I have for fuel economy is to keep a decent distance from the car in front. Often you'll find the guy ahead of you will brake, accelerate, brake again etc and you can practically coast along the whole time and keep up - not to mention it is much safer. Having a 1.8 doesn't hurt either.
ilsautomotive is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 05:12 PM   #14
ned
Once shy... twice bitten
 
ned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 7-11
Posts: 958
Default

I wish you good luck Luke, as you know about my problem now, me and the mechanic swapped the obvious things over on mine last night and it still came up as running rich. But if you do have any luck, I'll gladly try it!
__________________
The Devil crept into heaven... God overslept on the 7th... the New World Order was born on September 11.
ned is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 05:59 PM   #15
Paris Hilton
Custom User Title
 
Paris Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra, ACT HeadGaskets: 2
Posts: 1,830
Default

there's a big *** hill on the way to my school, steep as anything...i just put it in neutral and coast the whole way down (T5)...people say this is bad, why?
Paris Hilton is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 06:19 PM   #16
Damo
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,078
Default

yeah i've hear that rolling in nuetral isn't too good for your gear box.

Polyal: do you actually keep it in gear with your foot on the clutch ? That can't be too good for your clutch. It's called riding the clutch. :P Like what people do at traffic lights instead of going into nuetral than back to 1st.
Damo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 01:59 PM   #17
Polyal
The 'Stihl' Man
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damo
yeah i've hear that rolling in nuetral isn't too good for your gear box.

Polyal: do you actually keep it in gear with your foot on the clutch ? That can't be too good for your clutch. It's called riding the clutch. :P Like what people do at traffic lights instead of going into nuetral than back to 1st.
Um trying to remember, sometimes I might. But if I am in gear, with my clutch in then isn't the gear disengaged so there is no contact anyway is there?

I would say sometimes I will roll with it in gear and clutch in, and sometimes I will have it in nuetral, clutch out and roll.

I dont get that if the clutch is not engaged then how is it harming the 'box?
__________________
  • 2017 Toyota Prado (work hack)
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 02:05 PM   #18
EA2BA
PM me if you want
 
EA2BA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
Um trying to remember, sometimes I might. But if I am in gear, with my clutch in then isn't the gear disengaged so there is no contact anyway is there?

I would say sometimes I will roll with it in gear and clutch in, and sometimes I will have it in nuetral, clutch out and roll.

I dont get that if the clutch is not engaged then how is it harming the 'box?
harmful refers to automatics, manuals are fine go for it.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA

Send me a PM if you want to know anything

2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
EA2BA is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-01-2006, 11:35 PM   #19
Johno
Starter Motor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1
Default ACT sensor on EA

jus wondering if da EA has a ACT sensor\ and if so,, where is its location? if u hav pics, plz post em...
Johno is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 06:58 PM   #20
Inferno
Mr Forty Seven
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 536
Default

I do a lot of high speed driving, 80 and 100 zones.

I get about 680 out of tank, premium unleaded. I did have it down to 10L per 100k's when only going to work and back home, that was 25k there and back, so 50 and about 45 at high speed country driving in economy, now it's blown out a bit cos I have to drive through town, so I do about 90k's a day.
__________________
EFII Fairmont Ghia
Fully Optioned In White
XR Kit, Engine & Springs. Leather & Sunroof

Also Featuring

NFERNO Registration Plates
ELXR Front Bar & Bonnet with Sequential Scoop
18x8 Graphite Rims, Genie Extractors and Exhaust, Chrome Moulds
ELGT Steering Wheel, Clear Repeators, Cornering Lamps, Tinted Windows
Walnut Highlights, Pionner DEH-P9650MP Headunit & Pro-Series Speakers

Local Playground: Brisbane CBD and surrounding suburbs
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 01-06-2005, 11:47 PM   #21
NZ
~~~
 
NZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: At your U.B.
Posts: 2,099
Default

selekta: you'd use the same amount of fuel by using no throttle and using engine braking as you do coasting. plus you don't need to wear out the brakes as much.

i think another important factor just as important as a well tuned car is driving style.
__________________
EF Falcon Sedan 5.0 auto with IRS

"the man that crashs AFF"
NZ is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 12:58 AM   #22
EFFalcon
Last warning
 
EFFalcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Victoria HeadCount: 3
Posts: 11,194
Default

any sort of chip that can handle ur ignition timing and fuel mixtures...
once we go playing with cams we really screw our economy :P
its bad enough @ stock!
__________________
FALCN6 - Turbo, Air Bag Suspension - Hibernating
EL GT - Supercharged
NASCAR - 83 Thunderbird , Bagged
DAILY - BA Fairlane Ghia, Boss 260 Turbo
OFFROADER - Ford Explorer
EFFalcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 09:11 AM   #23
niko
likes falcon's
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,091
Default

brakes are cheaper than clutches but karl
__________________
www.carhubsales.com.au
niko is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 11:36 AM   #24
CruizinEB
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,705
Default

My fuel consumption is in the low 14s, toget that i just use premum all the time (It cleans the carbon from the engin)
CruizinEB is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 11:45 AM   #25
RG
Back to Le Frenchy
 
RG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Back home.....
Posts: 13,346
Default

Try replacing the hego (oxy?) sensor... the one in the exhaust just before the cat. Made a world of difference in mine.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
nah mate, aussie cars are the besterest and funnerest, nothing beats them, specially a poofy wrong wheel drive
07 Renault Sport Megane F1 Team R26 #1397
RG is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 01:55 PM   #26
Cairns GT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My fuel economy went out the window, and I was advised that a carbon build up can lead to unburnt fuel. This then causes the 02 sensors to pick up not enough fuel, meaning the computer pumps even more in. A good carbon flush and in my case injector clean ($85 dollars for all 8) put my car back to normal, and even made the exhaust quieter. I also agree with Kylebradshaw1 that Premium or Ultimate fuel will increase your fuel ecomomy, more than off setting the extra price you pay for the fuel.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 05:36 PM   #27
spope
Banned
 
spope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over there
Posts: 401
Default

"Riding" the clutch actually means when you have the clutch pedal partially pressed - clutch slips, creates excess wear.
If your foot is on the clutch pedal then it's completely disengaged, no contact between clutch plate and flywheel, so no wear. And it does no damage to the box, manuals are designed to do this. Nothing wrong with engine braking either, you just gotta know how to do it. ;)
Very bad to drive in neutral in an auto, for a few reasons, first being not enough fluid will circulate, and the other is the potential damage to internal components, as the rotation of the driveshaft will cause parts to spin, as opposed to being turned by engine torque. Not good.
Not really neccessary either, if you are coasting in an auto then your torque convertor should be close to maximum slip anyway.

Back to the original question though, have you checked your manifold for leaks? 2 of my manifold bolts were loose, caused me to use excess fuel - tightened them up, no probs. Some points to consider - the pcv system, map hose, and isc gasket. Because of the dodgy map sensor setup, the slightest leak will cause the ecu to pump in more fuel.
And check the oxy sensor too. If it's black and crusty, consider replacing.
spope is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 06:14 PM   #28
Psycho Chicken
Banned
 
Psycho Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
Default

If you keep the revs up more than enough oil will circulate.
Psycho Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-01-2006, 08:42 PM   #29
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho Chicken
If you keep the revs up more than enough oil will circulate.
... so chasing a mate down in traffic, pulling alongside him, putting it in N and punching it to 6k is OK then? :

(making sure the revs are somewhere around 1500 when I put it back in D) :P
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 02-06-2005, 10:38 PM   #30
InitialD
Low and Loud
 
InitialD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,273
Default

well my average was like 16.7 with good working injectors, etc...

I put new NGK "XR" spec sparkplugs in today and my average went down to 15.3

Im going to also change the O2 sensor over soon and see if thats my hassles...
__________________
1993 Ford Fairlane NC3 Silver - LTD mockup, Worked V8 & Auto, Fully Optioned, Half of my Audio department at work installed in the car

1993 Ford Falcon XR6 Poly Green Stationwagon - 4.0 I6, Auto, 3:45LSD, All the usual XR6 Stuff but in a wagon :
InitialD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL