Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Ford Australia Vehicles > Small and Mid Sized Cars > Focus

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2007, 01:20 PM   #31
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Does anyone know what impact the Ethanol blend fuel has on LS focus?

The local servo here always has the 95 RON E10 at 2 or 3 cents less than stnd 91 RON and typically 8 to 10 cents per litre cheaper than normal 95 RON.

Now the handbook says its ok to use E10 but will use more fuel.

So the question is how much more ??? Its roughly 8% cheaper but does it use more than 8% more fuel ? (compared to stnd 95 RON)

Does anyone have any data - scientific or anecdotal, to support an opinion on this ?

Last edited by Rhubarb; 06-07-2007 at 01:22 PM. Reason: clarification
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-07-2007, 01:31 PM   #32
BlackLS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
Does anyone know what impact the Ethanol blend fuel has on LS focus?

The local servo here always has the 95 RON E10 at 2 or 3 cents less than stnd 91 RON and typically 8 to 10 cents per litre cheaper than normal 95 RON.

Now the handbook says its ok to use E10 but will use more fuel.

So the question is how much more ??? Its roughly 8% cheaper but does it use more than 8% more fuel ? (compared to stnd 95 RON)

Does anyone have any data - scientific or anecdotal, to support an opinion on this ?
I've done 2 tanks on 95RON E10 with advanced engine timing and no probs. The car is able to run on E10
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-07-2007, 06:25 PM   #33
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

General scientific view is that fuel efficiency drops by 2-3% for E10 compared with regular ULP

How did you calculate 8-10% cheaper? If it's 8 to 10c cheaper than 95RON, you'd need to be paying only $1 per litre to get 8-10%. If you calculate it at $1.50 a litre, you are looking at more like about 6% cheaper.

Plus some of the high octane fuels are More fuel efficient.

I couldn't be bothered frankly. I stick with BP Ultimate. The extra cents are cheap maintenance of my car I reckon
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-07-2007, 07:03 PM   #34
XR5-Boy
You mad, bro?
 
XR5-Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 701
Default

yah, i agree. i was running ethanol blend in my Cougar but not now. I run standard premium in it now and it's being great. Ethanol was inefficient (only 450 to a tank!) chuck in standard premium and i get 550 now :| Depends on the car really. My old car which my sis has now (1991 TR Magna SE) runs ethanol blend no problem!
__________________
2009 LV Focus XR5 Turbo Performance Blue

SFS 2007 Best Cougar, SFS 2010/2011 Best Focus XR5
XR5-Boy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-07-2007, 09:22 PM   #35
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by melbzetec
General scientific view is that fuel efficiency drops by 2-3% for E10 compared with regular ULP

How did you calculate 8-10% cheaper? If it's 8 to 10c cheaper than 95RON, you'd need to be paying only $1 per litre to get 8-10%. If you calculate it at $1.50 a litre, you are looking at more like about 6% cheaper.

Plus some of the high octane fuels are More fuel efficient.

I couldn't be bothered frankly. I stick with BP Ultimate. The extra cents are cheap maintenance of my car I reckon


I live in Qld (SOO series winner .... again) and have filled up with the 95 RON E10 the last two tanks at $1.11 so nowhere near $1.50.

A 2-3% drop in fuel consumption with savings of 8% is still worth it in terms of economy, albeit insignificant in light of wife's recent spending. Focus on what I can control though hey .....
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 06-07-2007, 10:55 PM   #36
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
I live in Qld (SOO series winner .... again) and have filled up with the 95 RON E10 the last two tanks at $1.11 so nowhere near $1.50.

A 2-3% drop in fuel consumption with savings of 8% is still worth it in terms of economy, albeit insignificant in light of wife's recent spending. Focus on what I can control though hey .....
Yes, but when you say 8% cheaper, 8% cheaper than what? 8% cheaper than 95RON premium. So therefore you have to base it on the cost of 95RON.

And that 2-3 % drop is compared to standard ULP 91 RON. The ultra premium supposedly have a higher calorific value than standard ULP, so gives you even more kms per litre.

Your maths is a bit wonky, and you are sort of comparing apples with pineapples.
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-07-2007, 08:58 PM   #37
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

The question was ....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
So the question is how much more ??? Its roughly 8% cheaper but does it use more than 8% more fuel ? (compared to stnd 95 RON)
My maths is fine. Perhaps its my english ... or maybe your reading - who cares.

Either way, I was comparing E10 95 to stnd 95 RON.

So what represents better value?
- E10 95 Ron at $1.11/litre
OR
- Stnd 95 Ron at $1.20/litre
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-07-2007, 09:11 PM   #38
More revs
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 551
Default

Not sure how the numbers stack up but I have tried both and the E10 95 goes the same as E0 95 in mine, but the E10 is cheaper so it wins the non scientific test by more revs.

Two things I noted was standard 91 RON my Focus ran like it had my two sister inlaws in the back seat... +200 Kg. Also when I use 98 RON either ethanol or not it runs slightly better than 95 with more bottom end and about 50 Km more per tank.

Once again not a scientific test but seat of the pants (where I keep my wallet) the E10 95 wind every time.
More revs is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-07-2007, 09:37 PM   #39
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Interesting.

I'm going to try 98 E10 next time but hard to make a real comparison as my mix of hwy to city varies so much, depending on where I'm working that day.

People with a more consistant driving pattern should be able to give a better comparison than me.
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 07-07-2007, 11:15 PM   #40
melbzetec
Old enough to know better
 
melbzetec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhubarb
The question was ....



My maths is fine. Perhaps its my english ... or maybe your reading - who cares.
Drop the attitude. I was only trying to help. Go and save your few cents and be happy
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec.
Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior.
www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918

melbzetec is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 08-07-2007, 02:24 PM   #41
Rhubarb
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by melbzetec
Drop the attitude. I was only trying to help. Go and save your few cents and be happy

No attitude intended. I do appreciate the assistance.

Cheers.
Rhubarb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL