Why Ford Just Became A Software Company (Information Week)

[whynot]

http://www.informationweek.com/news/...1902920?pgno=1

Ford is upgrading its in-vehicle software on a huge scale, embracing all the customer expectations and headaches that come with the development lifecycle.

By Chris Murphy InformationWeek
November 14, 2011 09:31 AM

Sometime early next year, Ford will mail USB sticks to about 250,000 owners of vehicles with its advanced touchscreen control panel. The stick will contain a major upgrade to the software for that screen. With it, Ford is breaking from a history as old as the auto industry, one in which the technology in a car essentially stayed unchanged from assembly line to junk yard.

Ford is significantly changing what a driver or passenger experiences in its cars years after they’re built. And with it, Ford becomes a software company--with all the associated high customer expectations and headaches.

Ford is making a major upgrade to its MyFord Touch interface, which is an in-dash touchscreen that offers controls for navigation, music, phone integration, and temperature. For has offered the touchscreen on select vehicles since the fall of 2010. The new code promises to speed up the system's response and un-clutter the interface, adding features and responding to complaints about version 1. Ford's also updating the Sync software that's behind the MyFord Touch interface, adding tablet integration and better voice response. Ford will offer this upgraded version on 2013 Escape, Flex, and Taurus models hitting showrooms early next year, as well as the upgrade for existing owners.

The update's addressing shortcomings of MyFord Touch 1.0--such as having buttons too small for use while driving and too much information on the screens--but this isn't an emergency move, Ford insists. Ford always planned to make improvements to the software over a car's life. "We plan to do it constantly," says Gary Jablonski, manager of Sync Platform Development.

Ford has done revisions of its Sync software before, but never anything on this scale. In the past, it has had customers log onto a website and download an upgrade to a USB drive that they then plug into their vehicle. Or they could bring their car to their dealer for the upgrade. But Ford wants more customers to get into this download-and-upgrade habit. That's why it's mailing out the USB sticks, as well as keeping the option to take the vehicle to a dealer for the upgrade. "We want customers to expect that about Sync," Jablonski says.

One example of why such changes matter: Pandora, the online music streaming service, was a little-known startup when Ford launched its Sync software in 2007. As smartphones made Pandora a hit among young would-be buyers, Ford in 2010 added support for Pandora as one of the first smartphone apps integrated with Sync. Similarly, this update lets drivers connect their tablets to the Sync system, just as they can their smartphones, to access music and other apps using voice commands

What does it mean for Ford to become a software company? Most importantly, it means two different innovation cycles: one for the metal, one for the software.

It takes Ford about two-and-a-half years to plan, develop, and build a new car. But it can develop a new software interface in months--and update it again and again over the life of the car. When creating a hood, given the required stamping machinery and assembly line setup, manufacturers must set the design long before the car rolls off the line. Automakers can change software much closer to launch, though the code still faces rigorous testing.


Jablonski paints a picture: Imagine a fast-moving gear and a slow-moving gear, each of which must mesh at precisely the right moment to create a vehicle.

Ford’s upgrade also shows a timeless lesson of software: Version 1.0 is inevitably flawed, if only because until code lives in the real world, it'll have too many of some features and not enough of others. With the first version of MyFord Touch, drivers complained that there was just too much information--rarely used buttons for power users, for instance, were nearly as prominent as essential ones, like the radio volume.

The new version reacts to customer feedback by moving only the most used features to the foreground, and the fonts are up to 40% larger for the most important functions. In tests of the new software, "people are using words that I wouldn't expect, like 'calming,'" Jablonski says.

New Skills, Processes Required

Being a software company has also forced Ford to add new skills, which it has been doing over the past 10 years. Some of those were classic application development skills that a software company would have. Ford partnered with Microsoft to develop Sync, so Microsoft helped to "infuse Ford" with an understanding of what's needed to develop software, Jablonski says.

A second big thrust is for "human-machine interface," or HMI, engineers. These are people who study how people interact with technology. Ford has been cultivating these people from within since the early 2000s. HMI engineers come from a range of backgrounds, from software development to mechanical engineers. They're people who can live in worlds of art and science at once.

The biggest challenge, though, is deciding what goes in and what stays out of this software platform. "We essentially have a PC in the car, and there's no shortage of ideas of what we should do with that PC," Jablonski says.

And there's also no end. Unlike designing a new car or truck, where there are clear timelines when a new model comes out and where the development ends, and when work on the new model starts, the software cycle is less clear cut. "Unfortunately, there's no finish line in my job," Jablonski says.

[jpd80]

They had to do something, a lot of customers in the US are put off by My Ford touch,
the layout and sub menus are confusing to a lot of people, the reason was that Ford
outsources to developemnt of the software to a computer company but when Ford
discovered errors and difficulties, it was too hard to make immediate changes on
the production line, so they are sending out these upgrades on USB to cool,a few tempers..

[GT-E]

Pity they did not use the MYFORD in the FG and TZ. Would have given the local Fords, tech that would be class leading.

[Bundy]

Que, Roll the MS jokes....

Stop the car, wind up all the windows, ........

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by GT-E

Pity they did not use the MYFORD in the FG and TZ. Would have given the local Fords, tech that would be class leading.

Mate, from all reports customers would be spewing at Ford Austraila,
people find the sub menus confusing to the point of not using the thing
and plugging in your own music can send the thing for a wobbly......not happy Jan.

[csv8]

My cousin in Canada has a new Explorer LTD, has no problems with using the MYFORD etc..it would really put Ford Australia ahead of the dunnydore.

[jpd80]

Originally Posted by csv8

My cousin in Canada has a new Explorer LTD, has no problems with using the MYFORD etc..it would really put Ford Australia ahead of the dunnydore.

I know of people who have had serious glitches with the system too..

[wrongwaynorris]

Brings to memory this old gem .

" At a computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated: "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release (by Mr. Welch himself) stating:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason at all, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, executing a manoeuver such as a left-turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, and you would have to reinstall the engine.

4. When your car died on the freeway for no reason, you would just accept this, restart and drive on.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT', and then added more seats.

6. Apple would make a car powered by the sun, reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would run on only five per cent of the roads.

7. Oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car default' warning light.

8. New seats would force every-one to have the same size butt.

9. The airbag would say 'Are you sure?' before going off.

10. Occasionally, for no reason, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key, and grabbed the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of road maps from Rand-McNally (a subsidiary of GM), even though they neither need them nor want them. Trying to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Department.

12. Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You would press the 'start' button to shut off the engine. "

[Bossxr8]

Which begs the question why did they get Microsoft to develop it, when everybody knows how confusing and stupid their programs are?

[Nikked]

Originally Posted by jpd80

Mate, from all reports customers would be spewing at Ford Austraila,
people find the sub menus confusing to the point of not using the thing
and plugging in your own music can send the thing for a wobbly......not happy Jan.

Sounds like BMW's iDrive...

[Franco Cozzo]

Originally Posted by Bossxr8

Which begs the question why did they get Microsoft to develop it, when everybody knows how confusing and stupid their programs are?

It would have been better if they hired a bunch of linux developers who work on media center programs like MythTV etc, they know what they are doing and this kind of stuff is what they work on day in day out anyways.

[krzysiek]

Originally Posted by wrongwaynorris

Brings to memory this old gem .

" At a computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated: "If GM had kept up with the technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release (by Mr. Welch himself) stating:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason at all, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, executing a manoeuver such as a left-turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, and you would have to reinstall the engine.

4. When your car died on the freeway for no reason, you would just accept this, restart and drive on.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT', and then added more seats.

6. Apple would make a car powered by the sun, reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would run on only five per cent of the roads.

7. Oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car default' warning light.

8. New seats would force every-one to have the same size butt.

9. The airbag would say 'Are you sure?' before going off.

10. Occasionally, for no reason, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key, and grabbed the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of road maps from Rand-McNally (a subsidiary of GM), even though they neither need them nor want them. Trying to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by 50 per cent or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Department.

12. Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You would press the 'start' button to shut off the engine. "

Unfortunately for GM, Bill Gates didn't compare his company Microsoft with GM, but rather the computer industry. The computer industry has been moving forward with technology, full speed ahead.

For GM to release the above, targeting the Windows O/S is silly - because they've taken it out of context in my opinion.

Not that I support a comparison between the computer industry and auto industry - but the computer industry certainly has moved forward huge amounts - where the auto industry seems to be creeping forward.

[mash again]

im sure if we get that kind of system the fun police will make a law that says you cant use it unless you pullover and stop the car??

[aussie muscle]

7. Oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car default' warning light.

i think they are already moving to this for real.

[JC]

Originally Posted by wrongwaynorris

13. You would press the 'start' button to shut off the engine. "

New Mondeo does this doesn't it.

That's a funny comparison though - I remember this from when it first came out quite a few years ago, and it was just as funny (and true) then.