|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2006, 09:21 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
XF 393 3v CHI heads
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,437
|
hey fellas a very large arguement which tuned into a fight in the lunch room today was based around the claim that commodores dont have a chassis,?!?! i thought the chassis was the structual part of the car, consisting of the rails underneath and the frame of the car. many others (holden fans getting veery defensive about the vn platform apparently being used up until the VE commodore)
at this point i realised i knew very little about chassis and its components but decided to argue anyway because of what had just happened to lowdnes and i was angry at holden fans. they were saying only the utes have a chassis and all commodores have no chassis...they have a "subframe" they said its only a chassis if you can unbolt all the panels and have a rolling skeleton ?!?!! WTF? is this an outrageous statement or am i just a stubborn idiot?
__________________
XF Falcon, 393 Clevo. 11.01@123mph "RAZNREVNU" |
||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Lunchroom arguements! holdens and chassis
Threaded Mode