Quote:
Originally Posted by HP Dude
I find that an interesting statement given your signature! ;)
FWIW, the HP on smooth tarmac handles as well (if not better) than the IRS models: hence the racetrack advantage. However, on bumpy roads, I'd rather be behind the wheel of an IRS XR.
In regards to oversteer, the HP is a beautifully progressive power oversteerer. There's absolutely no lack of control; and if there is, it's because the guy behind the wheel is a knob who can't drive.
To be honest, I've found the HP more comfortable/progressive in oversteer than the IRS XR8. This again relates to that racetrack advantage that a HP has over the IRS XRs.
They way I look at it, the XR models complement each other. Each has different strengths and weaknesses. I think they complement each other well:
XR8 and XR6 VCT: Fun in the twisties where the surfaces are crap or wet.
XR6HP: Fun and faster than the VCT on the racetrack (and pretty much as quick as an XR8 even with the power and torque deficit).
Again, I like all three.
|
Dont get me wrong im sure the HP is a very capable car in the handling department , however no other live axle falcon I have driven (on the street i might add) has come close to an
IRS falcon in terms of puting power down in certain situations and general rear end adheasiveness. From what ive been told the HP is fantastic on the track - i dont drive my car on the track (unfortunately) so i wouldnt know how the
IRS AU compares in those situations.
Thats the major reason for me choosing a VCT over a HP. The power windows and 6 stacker etc dont excite me.I was sold on the cars balance and grip levels.
James