|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-04-2013, 12:04 AM | #1 | |||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
I had this same idea:
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2013/0...tang-boss-351/ Excerpt: Quote:
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
|||
10-04-2013, 12:55 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
I'd be curious if a 5.8 NA was any more effective than the current 5L NA though. More torque, quite likely, but im not sure if its power delivery and track manners would be better.
|
||
10-04-2013, 02:49 PM | #3 | ||
Long live the GT !
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 1,863
|
I'm sure a BOSS 351 GT would be a huge hit!
If the current 5.0 n/a motor makes 420hp in the Mustang GT, the 5.8 would be making over 475hp with a 7000rpm redline. And imagine the noise it would make!
__________________
2018 Ford Mustang GT - Oxford White | Auto | Herrod Tune | K&N Filter | StreetFighter Oil Separators | H&R Springs | Whiteline Vertical Links | Ceramic Protection | Tint "Whatya think of me car, XR Falcon, 351 Blown Cleveland running Motec injection and runnin' on methanol... goes pretty hard too, got heaps of torque for chucking burnouts, IT'S UNREAL !!" - Poida
|
||
10-04-2013, 03:21 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
It's not that simple though. The 5.8 is based on the 5.4, effectively making it a first generation modular. The 5.0 is next gen, has VCT available on all 4 cams and other goodies.
|
||
10-04-2013, 05:05 PM | #6 | ||
N/A all the way
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,459
|
Do it !!!!
__________________
BA GT 5.88 litres of Modular Boss Powered Muscle 300++ RWKW N/A on 98 octane on any dyno, happy or sad, on any day, with any operator you choose - 12.39@115.5 full weight |
||
10-04-2013, 05:17 PM | #7 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
Quote:
A different time maybe they would've done a tall deck Coyote instead of BOSS, but I suspect its roots from the Hurricane project date earlier than Coyote and Ford all but admitted they felt they were vulnerable to GM and Chrysler based on capacity of their F series V8's. |
|||
10-04-2013, 05:44 PM | #8 | ||
Oo\===/oO
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
|
Wait, Ford should put effort and money into removing the supercharger a superseded engine (designed in its form to be blown anyway), in a soon to be superseded model...just to have a badge name?
I'd rather see ford put their effort into the 50th anniversary mustangs, and some exotic killing 2015 mustangs!
__________________
|
||
10-04-2013, 08:47 PM | #9 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, Northern Suburbs
Posts: 5,011
|
Quote:
and fit ecoboost
__________________
2024
Making Whine from the Tears of Hippies |
|||
11-04-2013, 11:32 AM | #10 | |||
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
|
|||
11-04-2013, 12:51 PM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
That's correct but that's in Falcon. Mustang has a different ECU and both 3.7 V6 and 5.0 V8 have VCT phasers on all cams. 5.4 only ever has VCT available in the 3V models.
|
||
11-04-2013, 01:36 PM | #12 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 3,479
|
I was just thinking the other day it would be cool if Ford did a 429 to go up against the Camaro 427. Dodge should up the SRT8 Challenger to a 426 Hemi. Then it would be just like the good old days!
Seriously though, I am hoping the next gen Mustang will offer a 5.0 V8 EcoBoost and 3.5 V6 EcoBoost in addition to the 4cyl EcoBoost. That would put Ford in the same league as Mercedes. |
||
11-04-2013, 02:40 PM | #13 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
They've got the 777 motor they could dust off, but being a BOSS motor, which is larger and heavier than 5.4/5.8, it would be a bit big block vs small block.
|
||
11-04-2013, 08:15 PM | #14 | ||
Blue Blood
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Out West
Posts: 210
|
How hard would it be to for Ford to change the 5l Coyote to a 5.8? Is is as easy as changing the crank and rods?
__________________
2005 BA GT Mll #0697. 1979 XD 5.8 X Pursuit 2015 FGX XR8 Powered by FORD |
||
11-04-2013, 08:54 PM | #15 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
I think the largest capacity aftermarket kits are only 5.3l so they would need to increase the deck height to where the 5.4 was to get more stroke.
|
||
12-04-2013, 02:58 AM | #16 | ||||
Cynical Idealist
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
But Saleen seems to have found a way to increase displacement (this was announced months ago): http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...NEWS/121209896 Excerpt: Quote:
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with! |
||||
This user likes this post: |
12-04-2013, 06:53 AM | #17 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Salamander Bay
Posts: 5,427
|
the Coyote has been proven in the police special to be capable of 406 RWKW with nothing more than an exhaust and a tune that's around 500 FWKW . so with just a tune a GT 351 (KW) is quite achievable. why would any sane person suggest that a struggling ford Australia invest many millions of dollars in developing another performance engine when we have a massively under tuned one already with plenty of potential.
It seems to me some people can never be satisfied, we have available a package that makes the red side look quite sad with plenty of scope to be modified to develop more power than most of you can handle . I just don't get it
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Everyone starts off with a bag full of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the experience bag before the luck bag is empty. "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." Start a new career as a bus driver Rides: FG2 XR6 stock at this stage but a very nice ride xc 4 DOOR X CHASER 5.8 UNDER RESTO |
||
12-04-2013, 07:27 AM | #18 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
|
I'm sure the ten or so specials they would sell a year would more than make up for the development dollars...
Times are moving on...I love V8's...I've got one in our old Kingswood ute...but the future isn't bigger and bigger V8's. The development dollars could be far better spent on other areas like handling, turbo sixes (and, *gasp*, fours), and better chassis dynamics to deal with a real world of increasingly strict and comprehensive restrictions, where a car with a sweet chassis and good handling will sell like hot cakes...not necessarily the most powerful car or one with the biggest cylinder count, but the one that's fun to drive within the limits that were are being hammered with everywhere. Now taking votes for least favourite comment in history... |
||
This user likes this post: |
12-04-2013, 12:39 PM | #19 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,331
|
Quote:
|
|||
2 users like this post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|