Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27-01-2006, 05:11 PM   #31
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gozza
avgas is 101 low lead
This is from Mobil dude, and is also on the Lycoming website as minimum spec for fuel.
"Grade 100LL has two milliliters of lead per gallon and is rated at 100 octane when the engine is leaned for cruise, and at 130 octane when the mixture is set at rich. The fuel is designated as "low lead" because the previous fuel with a 100/130 octane rating contained twice as much lead, four milliliters per gallon."

Capri dude wants to run his car full rich, not leaned out.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-01-2006, 06:16 PM   #32
Grechie
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Grechie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,728
Default

ive used pro strength nulon octane booster only once with optimax extreme, found less emissions out the back, thats all
__________________
2015 FGX XR8 - 557rwkw on E85
KPM Street Fighter
PCMTec
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 - 255/35/19 - 275/35/19
Shockworks Coilovers
PITLANE AUTOMOTIVE & PERFORMANCE
Grechie is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-01-2006, 06:28 PM   #33
Outbackjack
Central to all beach's
 
Outbackjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,653
Default

AVGAS at 130??? 100LL is 100 octane low lead.....
Outbackjack is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-01-2006, 09:27 AM   #34
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Outbackjack
AVGAS at 130??? 100LL is 100 octane low lead.....
re my earlier post above. I work in Aviation dude so if you need further proof i suggest you look at engine manufacturers sites for requirements for casa and faa approval. 100 octane is only at a lean mix ie in a cruise. 130 octane is at full rich ie takeoff.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-01-2006, 09:29 AM   #35
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Atmospheric pressure also makes a difference, and the last time I checked, cars are not fitted with a manual mix control. 100/130 octane is standard on all piston aircraft
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-01-2006, 09:49 AM   #36
Mr. CVE
If it aint Blown it Sucks
 
Mr. CVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S E Melbourne
Posts: 2,115
Default

Um All this octane talk for avgas has me confused.
Are we talking RON or MON ?
and my changing the mixture ( A/F ratio), you can change the octane rating ?? now you have me confused.
__________________
Australia's fastest 3V n/a Ghia 13.52 @ 102 mph
@235 rwkw !!
Now turbo 11.77 @114 mph
320 rwkw, 810 nm torque, 280rwkw @3000 rpm !! :thebirds:
Now for sale
http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11296772

Thanks to Snort Performance, Headsex and CVE
Street car DeTomaso Pantera
Drag car 1995 Mustang, Haleys Comet ( It's back !)
Power by CVE
Melbourne's first SNIPER Tuner :
Now tuning E series
Mr. CVE is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-01-2006, 12:52 AM   #37
jav
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

1/2 a liter of metho, cheapest boost you'll ever get.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-01-2006, 09:00 PM   #38
ltd
Force Fed Fords
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Enroute
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by v8capri
Um All this octane talk for avgas has me confused.
Are we talking RON or MON ?
and my changing the mixture ( A/F ratio), you can change the octane rating ?? now you have me confused.
Ok, the octane rating for avgas is RON, and is rated by the American Petroleum Institute. Piston aircraft engines have compression ratios higher than 13:1, and need a much higher octane fuel to prevent pre-detonation within the various conditions, atmospheric pressures that they operate at.

Essentially, the octane rating of all petroleums changes due to altitude and the effect of a lower density air on the perfect chemical condition.

At a lean cruise (lean being set by the actual mixture control lever in the ИИИИpit) setting ie, 10000 ft with a mixture of say 1 part fuel to 110 parts air, the nominal octane rating of the fuel is 100 RON, this takes into account the much lower density of the air at that altitude. As a result, less fuel is used to counteract the fact that less oxygen is available due to density. The engine is still trying to draw in the same amount of air in the cylinders but is not able to (like when you stand atop a 10000 ft mountain and notice its harder to breathe) so less fuel/air mix results in a lower compression ratio and a lower specific energy/octane value for the fuel at that condition. The fuel is engineered to specific values to take into account that an engine operating at 10000 ft might only have a compression ratio of 6:1 at that altitude.

At sea level, when you have the mixture set to the full rich setting say 1 part fuel to 75 parts air, the nominal octane value of the fuel is 130 RON. This is because there is more air (higher compression ratio for same volume compared to altitude) and the air being more dense lowers the flash point of the fuel due to increased volatility of that particular richer mix. This is a chemically perfect condition of the fuel under these circumstances and more power is attainable.

To overcome these problems aircraft engine manufacturers have put on more expensive planes turbocharged engines.

If you recall the Whyalla aircraft crash in that Piper chieftain the guy was running twin Lycoming TSIO-JT2B turbo charged 540 cubic inch 6 cylinder engines. The problem was, the turbo's run about 40 pounds of boost at sea level and around 8 pounds at altitude, so there is alot of scope for setting the correct mix (due to the atmospheric density being overcome by pressurised air fed to the engines). Combined with this and a lack of that particular engines characteristics for lean cruise setup the pilot (who had minimal hours and was only about 20) ran too lean a mixture (not enough fuel, high temperatures), ran too high a temperature and ended up hole-ing a couple of pistons, melting bearings conrods and damaging both crankshafts. Unfortunately that plane and all PAX perished due to a double engine failure where one failed and he put full power on the other failing engine causing it to prematurely fail.
__________________
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to power an ants go-cart a half a lap around a Cheerio - Ron Shirley


Quote:
Powered by GE
ltd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL