|
07-03-2011, 09:41 PM | #121 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
the bits and peices ive read around the trap leads me to believe ford is doing a very good job in australia to stay in the black, deliever euro qaulity cars(some coming soon) and also on topic...do the right thing for the falcon>
|
||
07-03-2011, 11:15 PM | #122 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 513
|
It doesn't matter if Ford only sell 100 falcons a month as long as they sell at a profit as has been stated in this forum many times . Although the smaller the sales are the greater the profit they have to make on each unit. It will get to the point where if they only sell 90 a month they better only be making them for $2 each.
|
||
14-03-2011, 10:46 PM | #123 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
Toyota banks on another million market
Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
15-03-2011, 09:43 AM | #124 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,451
|
Quote:
I get the "make less, make it smarter" mantra many on here go on about, but Ford in my opinion tipped past that point a few years ago. With no export market to boost volume and a large car market dieing, they are in caretaker mode. Do the bare minimum needed to keep interest until Ford US make up their minds what to do. Holden, whether they were successful or not, did try and give the Commodore a brighter future by actively looking for opportunities to keep it being made here. Exports and recently the Cruze are part of that effort. You can debate whether they are succeeding, but they have tried. Ford cut cost, cut costs again, froze or cancelled R&D, delayed, stopped and restarted projects, fobbed off warranty recalls, wound down marketing and got caught with their pants down, with no cars in the configurations companies want to buy right now. Thats not being smarter then Holden. Dan |
|||
15-03-2011, 07:39 PM | #125 | |||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
|
|||
15-03-2011, 11:54 PM | #126 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,504
|
Quote:
|
|||
16-03-2011, 12:26 AM | #127 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,369
|
I sometimes wonder about a few things:
1) Local manufacturing, is FoA viable at really low production levels? 2) Is Ford using Mondeo Vs Falcon to decide which way to hop post 2015? |
||
16-03-2011, 04:43 AM | #128 | |||
Donating Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,862
|
Quote:
1) Local manufacturing, is FoA viable at really low production levels? No 2) Is Ford using Mondeo Vs Falcon to decide which way to hop post 2015? Decision made IMO |
|||
16-03-2011, 07:06 AM | #129 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,369
|
Quote:
here reviewing progress on both ahead of final submission around August-September. All that's fine and dandy but in the here and now, Falcon might not survive until 2015, not if people decide they want something other than a large sedan. Some on here do trivialise the Mondeo but if marketed right with diesel and Ecoboost, it could be Falcon's biggest internal competitor, it feels like the gloves have come off and Ford are asking the market / getting the market used to choosing between the two... |
|||
16-03-2011, 09:28 AM | #130 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
16-03-2011, 10:57 AM | #131 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Quote:
Lets look at some possible truths... Mondeo does everything the falcon does New Ranger does everything the Falcon Ute does Mondeo Wagon replaces Falcon Wagon Territory replaces Ford Wagon (to a point) So many options...the fact that the territory has and should do well throws a spanner in the works, because if One Ford rang true then the new Explorer should replace it. Product wise we can lose the falcon, but will the Explorer fill the gap? I am not sure, it doesn't have a good name here. Now the interesting thing for me is Lincoln (I recall an article stating they were/thinking of coming here). IMO there is no room for them and a Falcon. Therefore this platform IMO is the only hope we have of holding onto the Falcon as I mentioned above. Maybe, just maybe, a GRWD platform, with Lincoln in mind, could be used for the falcon wither keeping just the G6/XR/FPV's going or keeping a full Falcon line up... Maybe a good sign was the Miami development...I mean would Prodrive really expect to make $40M back on that engine before 2015/2016?? That engine would sit nicely in a Lincoln. Another factor might be a bit of good will from Ford NA...if FoA do develop the GRWD platform then maybe the losses made from the falcon could be swallowed easier. Yes profit is wanted, but in the grand scheme of Ford Global I dont think we would rate to highly....obviously hemorrhaging wont be accepted. I just wish we knew a little bit more...but knowing either way might jeopardize current sales.
__________________
|
|||
16-03-2011, 11:04 AM | #132 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,927
|
Urghhhh
Mondeo still needs a decent power plant, we always get the lower end of what the europe models get, if we got the high output eco boots and diesel i personally could live without Falcon... Territory on the other hand is my favourite Ford of all time, even though I dont currently own one... Explorers well Id have to drive a new one to see what it was like, but it would have been a long way forward from their last 2004 model. |
||
16-03-2011, 11:41 AM | #133 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,021
|
What if Taurus and Mondeo became one car and Falcon and Mustang also became one and the same? Common chassis and different top hats much like Camaro and Commodore?
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
16-03-2011, 11:50 AM | #134 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Well yes I dont see the point with the mondeo and taurus co existing either...surely they will become one.
But yeah, Falcon/Linclon/Mustang off the same platform would make sense to me.
__________________
|
||
28-03-2011, 06:45 PM | #135 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,799
|
Ute prices unloaded as run-outs ramp up
http://www.goauto.com.au/mellor/mell...25785D0016DBA6 Quote:
__________________
Daniel |
|||
24-04-2011, 05:45 PM | #136 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|||
26-04-2011, 11:55 AM | #137 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
Maybe Taurus has to be that large for Americans? I don't know. But it's going to be the interceptor for the foreseeable. So even after it's current iteration is no longer for sale to the public, it's platform will still be built, and sold to the coppers... and they won't let a singular platform go to just two vehicles. But what happens to D4? That's just an adaptation of D3 to the crossover segment. So anything that replaces D3, will most likely D4 replace too. But then again. The Americans won't let One Ford get in the way of the F trucks or mustang, and if they have to will continue to make them off of single budgets, for single markets. All I'm saying is, we can't expect the Brass at Dearborn to go with anything that makes sense. Just because it in fact does make sense.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||