|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-12-2005, 10:03 AM
|
#1 | ||
|
Ex EL Falcon
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bris-bane
Posts: 683
|
Just having a look at the specs of the EL Falcon and it would appear that it uses grouped injection rather than sequential... is there any reason why this is the case and would this partially explain why the E-series multipoint injected Falcons weren't so good on fuel?
I was also going over our Magna and noticed that it is actually sequential... so any real reason why Ford didn't go with sequential on the Falcon? |
||
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 10:10 AM
|
#2 | ||
|
Custom user title
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,892
|
The fuel savings arnt as big as u would think from sequential... And because ford are a bunch of tight **** terries would explain a fair bit
|
||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 11:44 AM
|
#3 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,381
|
What he said. Not much benefit, and would have cost $ to implement. What you do get with sequential EFI is better emmisions which is probably why the AU's got sequential, but they had a whole lot of ECU related changes all at once.
there is an interesting read here about sequential vs batch fire http://www.sdsefi.com/techseq.htm |
||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 01:17 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
PM me if you want
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pk Ranger Modding - QLD 👍
Posts: 7,498
|
AU are only sequential to about 3,000rpm then they go to banked just like the e-series, the BA is the first true 100% sequential.
__________________
Owner of first ever car to retrofit BA SSS - the EA2BA Send me a PM if you want to know anything 2010 Ford Ranger PK High Rider (Auto) - 2011 Ford Fiesta (Auto)
|
||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 01:18 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think you're all missing the point that 5.0L's are all sequential..
|
||
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 01:36 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
rocknrolla
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 1,589
|
5.0 is an american motor. ford aus just imported them. their efi isnt anything like a 4.0
|
||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 06:22 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
meow
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Where the Pirates are.
Posts: 2,744
|
Can someone explain banked(grouped?)/ sequential injection for me please?
|
||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 09:07 PM
|
#8 | |||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pit Lane
Posts: 11,867
 
|
Quote:
Sequential injection each injector fire individually and at the correct time based on inlet valve opening |
|||
|
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 11:07 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
|
Meh who cares, VNs fire the lot at once.
|
||
|
|
|
Why is E-series grouped not sequential injection?
Linear Mode
