|
06-07-2007, 01:20 PM | #31 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
|
Does anyone know what impact the Ethanol blend fuel has on LS focus?
The local servo here always has the 95 RON E10 at 2 or 3 cents less than stnd 91 RON and typically 8 to 10 cents per litre cheaper than normal 95 RON. Now the handbook says its ok to use E10 but will use more fuel. So the question is how much more ??? Its roughly 8% cheaper but does it use more than 8% more fuel ? (compared to stnd 95 RON) Does anyone have any data - scientific or anecdotal, to support an opinion on this ? Last edited by Rhubarb; 06-07-2007 at 01:22 PM. Reason: clarification |
||
06-07-2007, 01:31 PM | #32 | |||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|||
06-07-2007, 06:25 PM | #33 | ||
Old enough to know better
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
|
General scientific view is that fuel efficiency drops by 2-3% for E10 compared with regular ULP
How did you calculate 8-10% cheaper? If it's 8 to 10c cheaper than 95RON, you'd need to be paying only $1 per litre to get 8-10%. If you calculate it at $1.50 a litre, you are looking at more like about 6% cheaper. Plus some of the high octane fuels are More fuel efficient. I couldn't be bothered frankly. I stick with BP Ultimate. The extra cents are cheap maintenance of my car I reckon
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec. Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior. www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918
|
||
06-07-2007, 07:03 PM | #34 | ||
You mad, bro?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 701
|
yah, i agree. i was running ethanol blend in my Cougar but not now. I run standard premium in it now and it's being great. Ethanol was inefficient (only 450 to a tank!) chuck in standard premium and i get 550 now :| Depends on the car really. My old car which my sis has now (1991 TR Magna SE) runs ethanol blend no problem!
__________________
2009 LV Focus XR5 Turbo Performance Blue SFS 2007 Best Cougar, SFS 2010/2011 Best Focus XR5
|
||
06-07-2007, 09:22 PM | #35 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
I live in Qld (SOO series winner .... again) and have filled up with the 95 RON E10 the last two tanks at $1.11 so nowhere near $1.50. A 2-3% drop in fuel consumption with savings of 8% is still worth it in terms of economy, albeit insignificant in light of wife's recent spending. Focus on what I can control though hey ..... |
|||
06-07-2007, 10:55 PM | #36 | |||
Old enough to know better
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
|
Quote:
And that 2-3 % drop is compared to standard ULP 91 RON. The ultra premium supposedly have a higher calorific value than standard ULP, so gives you even more kms per litre. Your maths is a bit wonky, and you are sort of comparing apples with pineapples.
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec. Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior. www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918
|
|||
07-07-2007, 08:58 PM | #37 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
|
The question was ....
Quote:
Either way, I was comparing E10 95 to stnd 95 RON. So what represents better value? - E10 95 Ron at $1.11/litre OR - Stnd 95 Ron at $1.20/litre |
|||
07-07-2007, 09:11 PM | #38 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 551
|
Not sure how the numbers stack up but I have tried both and the E10 95 goes the same as E0 95 in mine, but the E10 is cheaper so it wins the non scientific test by more revs.
Two things I noted was standard 91 RON my Focus ran like it had my two sister inlaws in the back seat... +200 Kg. Also when I use 98 RON either ethanol or not it runs slightly better than 95 with more bottom end and about 50 Km more per tank. Once again not a scientific test but seat of the pants (where I keep my wallet) the E10 95 wind every time. |
||
07-07-2007, 09:37 PM | #39 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
|
Interesting.
I'm going to try 98 E10 next time but hard to make a real comparison as my mix of hwy to city varies so much, depending on where I'm working that day. People with a more consistant driving pattern should be able to give a better comparison than me. |
||
07-07-2007, 11:15 PM | #40 | |||
Old enough to know better
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,311
|
Quote:
__________________
Manual 2003 Machine Silver 5 Door LR Focus Zetec. Mods: Ford Racing CNC'd cylinder head milled .040", 3 angle valve grind. Ford Racing Stage II camshafts. Ford Racing cam gears. Ford Racing long tube header. Random Technology hi flow cat. Herrod 2.25" stainless cat-back. Pipercross Viper intake. CFM 65mm throttle body. 2000 ported intake manifold. Herrod Custom SCT tune. Eibach suspension. Quaife ATB diff. Wilwood 13" brakes. Custom ST170 leather interior. www.cardomain.com/ride/2773918
|
|||
08-07-2007, 02:24 PM | #41 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
|
Quote:
No attitude intended. I do appreciate the assistance. Cheers. |
|||