|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28-07-2013, 01:42 PM | #61 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,224
|
Quote:
Quote:
Having said that, we have a canopy plus bigger all terrain tyres... so maybe that affects it. Cruising at or under 80km/h seems to be its most economical point.. |
||||
28-07-2013, 01:46 PM | #62 | |||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,604
|
Quote:
Aerodynamics play a bit part in fuel efficiency. |
|||
28-07-2013, 01:49 PM | #63 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,224
|
|
||
28-07-2013, 04:51 PM | #64 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: On The Footplate.
Posts: 5,086
|
Quote:
Then again, out of a large four wheel drive like a Triton, 10ltr/100km is amazing, and shows how far diesel tech has come in even just the last 10 years. ...and hey, at least it isn't a petrol Triton (or other popular four wheel drive)...they still suck petrol like there's a hole in the tank, even with new technology... Last edited by 2011G6E; 28-07-2013 at 05:15 PM. |
|||
29-08-2013, 07:32 PM | #65 | ||
Starter Motor
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 16
|
I recently bought a low K MA Mondeo 2.0ltr TDCI. I wanted; 5 star ANCAP, economy, reasonable size, and towing capability.
The care has amazing power, every safety feature, is almost as big inside as a Falcon (with a huge boot), high quality fit and finish, and can haul 1.6 ton! I am getting close to 1000kms around town and further on the highway. I will not buy a petrol car again. BTW VW was out of the question because of the DSG shitebox and I love Fords. I currently have three, Territory, old Falcon, and Mondeo. |
||
29-08-2013, 08:35 PM | #66 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 548
|
I have noticed this, I reckon there must be 107.3 % rise in Nissan patrol utes with extractors with owners that must be tone deaf . Always flogging them and going nowhere around here . Godawful constipated melody do they make .
|
||
29-08-2013, 09:06 PM | #67 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,339
|
Quote:
I'd say the V12 turbo diesel Q7 would be pretty fun to drive. |
|||
29-08-2013, 09:18 PM | #68 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 159
|
Hi,
I noticed in this thread there were several discussions regarding the fuel efficiency of diesels especially when handling heavy loads. My experience with diesels and fuel efficiency has been somewhat unique. I have only ever own one diesel, which was the Navara. Whilst to compare it to my other cars under normal use is unfair there is one situation where I can make a reasonably fair comparison, which is towing almost 2 tonne of boat interstate. I have performed the same trip over the last 10 years with various vehicles and wrote a post about it a while ago. My original Post: http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthr...ht=towing+xr50 Each trip has been very similar in terms of distance and all up towing weight. Since writing this post I have completed several more trips with my XR50 turbo and when it comes to economy my XR50 turbo eats my Navara for breakfast (I won’t even both comparing the two when it comes to performance). What I learnt from this is it isn’t so much the type of engine that makes it good or bad when hauling big loads; it is very much about how each engine makes its power. My XR50 makes a boat load of power and torque down low which makes it superb hauling big loads. AS I am nearing the end of my current lease there is one thing for sure, I won't be contributing to the increase in diesel registrations anytime soon. Just my 2 cents worth. Thanks, Chris
__________________
My Ride: Ford XR50 Turbo Factory / Dealer Options: Auto, Silhouette, Sunroof, Rev Park Camera, Tint, Hayman Reece HD Tow Pack, 19" Spare Wheel My Options: Herrod Performance Air-Box & K&N Hi-Flow Air Filter, Garmin GPS, ClicOn iPhone Car Kit, 9" Headrest DVD Players, additional power points. |
||