|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21-05-2011, 06:31 PM | #1 | ||
Chairman & Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 1975
Posts: 107,403
|
May 20 2011
Boasting exceptionally good front head room as well as rear leg room and knee clearance in the Double Cab, Ford's global pickup gives customers maximum interior space without compromising the substantial cargo box volume. Engineers put in a lot of effort into keeping the vehicle short but the occupant space large by fully utilising every millimetre of Ranger's dimensions. They also came up with innovative solutions to make sure there's no wasted space. At the start of the Ranger program, the engineers were given targets for the pickup's interior, overall length and the box length. "We weren't quite sure how to get all of them to add up. It was like making 2+2 = 3," quipped David Stanley, package supervisor, Product Development, Ford Australia. In the end they found a way to optimise the clearance between the rear seat, the box and the body structure. They slimmed down the back of the seats and headrests, while ensuring the same level of comfort. They also used clever shapes in the sheet metal, by utilising smaller sections instead of one large section. This meant they could make the body structure thinner without compromising on the vehicle integrity. Likewise, to achieve front head room of 1022mm, the engineers squeezed the clearance between the headliner and the sheet metal to the absolute minimum. "It should be big enough to do its job and no more," Stanley said. "We try to account for every millimetre and during Ranger's development, we'd often find a few millimetres here and a few millimetres there which we would pare down to push out the interior as much as possible." As a result, Ranger's front leg, shoulder and hip room are ultra-competitive while the overall roominess in the front is set to rival some leading competitors. Zooming in on the back seat With Ranger increasingly being a work-and-family vehicle, the engineers have paid special attention to the rear seats. While the second row in the Super Cab is very spacious, it's the rear seats in the Double Cab that truly shine. Shifting away from the one-door-fits-all approach, Ranger now has a two-door strategy. The Regular Cab and Super Cab share one long front door, while the Double Cab has a separate shorter front door. Moving the B-pillar forward in the Double Cab has done Ranger a whole world of good. The Double Cab delivers rear leg room of 902mm and knee clearance of 39mm. This translates into three adults fitting easily in the second row while two six-footers can comfortably sit one behind the other. The rear ingress and egress are also among the best in the segment. Moreover, the rear glass is bigger which not only helps the driver’s vision but also gives the second-row occupants a more spacious feeling, due to the greater amount of light that comes in. The perception of roominess is further enhanced by the B-pillar being further away from the eye. To open up the interior even more, engineers went down to the details and optimised the pillar size, pillar trim and the blackout on the glass, squeezing them as small as possible. Still, it wasn't enough to whittle down every last millimetre. The engineers made sure the seat back angle was optimised. Some competitors make the rear seats very vertical to improve leg room and knee room but second-row occupants might just end up slouching into the available knee room. "We wanted Ranger to be better than an ordinary pickup. We wanted it to have the comfort levels of an SUV," Stanley said. "So we looked at the hip angle, back angle and torso angle to make sure we've got it right."
__________________
Observatio Facta Rotae
|
||
21-05-2011, 06:44 PM | #2 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Are the really "official" pics?
It might have more room but it still looks cramped, granted they are all the same.
__________________
|
||
21-05-2011, 06:48 PM | #3 | ||
LIKE A BOSS 351
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 2,779
|
The rear bench seat looks a bit tacky, I'm guessing that's one of the base models?
|
||
21-05-2011, 06:50 PM | #4 | |||
Chasing a FORD project!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide
Posts: 5,114
|
That last pic, the dog looks stoned...
__________________
Quote:
1996 BMW 740iL V8. TV, phone, leather, sunroof, satnav, all as standard. Now with 19" TSW Brooklands, 2 1/2" stainless steel exhaust, plus more coming soon. |
|||
21-05-2011, 07:02 PM | #5 | ||
XA GT
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,128
|
Any one notice Its left hand drive. It does look like a base model. There looks to be more room in the back than others I've seen.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- XA GT, 6.848sec 1/8 mile @ 101.68mph |
||
21-05-2011, 07:09 PM | #6 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Moree, NSW
Posts: 2,076
|
Anyone happen to read the article and realize that its the Space Cab model, it looks to me to have more room then the PJ/K model.
__________________
Nathan 2005 FPV BF Super Pursuit The new toy (now sold) The SP The old ute (sold) www.aufalcon.com/nc1183 Build Thread Quote:
|
|||
21-05-2011, 07:11 PM | #7 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 824
|
Sorry, I just had to:
But in all seriousness, I hope that's the base model as the back bench seats look very uncomfortable, but promising with higher up models. |
||
21-05-2011, 07:25 PM | #8 | ||
Pity the fool
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
|
It's a mule. You can tell by the big red 'emergency stop' button mounted to the console.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned: 1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin |
||
21-05-2011, 07:25 PM | #9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,023
|
You guys do realise its just the extra cab version? Rear seats are really only designed for short trips.
Look at the Hilux for example.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170 2004 BA wagon RTV project. 1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red 1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired 1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project. |
||
21-05-2011, 07:28 PM | #10 | ||
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,750
|
Why do they bother putting 'seats' in the space cab versions?
|
||
21-05-2011, 07:37 PM | #11 | |||
Chairman & Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 1975
Posts: 107,403
|
Quote:
They are what came with the media release so if you really have an issue with the quality of the pictures, the state of mind the dog is in (or out) of or why they even bother then take it up with them. Russ
__________________
Observatio Facta Rotae
|
|||
21-05-2011, 07:51 PM | #12 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,137
|
Quote:
|
|||
21-05-2011, 07:59 PM | #13 | |||
I was correct - AGAIN
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
|
|||
21-05-2011, 08:00 PM | #14 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Just a simple question Russ, they look amateurish at best, not quite a release I would expect from a global product but there you go. I understand they are pushing the family friendly envelope but still, someone might aswell be giving the guy in the background some rabbit ears.
__________________
|
||
21-05-2011, 08:04 PM | #15 | ||
XY,XC,XEx2,XA,EF,AU,BA,XY
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ballarat, Victoria.
Posts: 444
|
Would be perfect for carting the kids around to something local. Additionally you'd have a longer tray back Vs what you'd have on the true twin/crew cab. Weigh up the options, and what you use it for the most I guess.
__________________
A sad day when there's no Falcon variant in the garage! |
||
21-05-2011, 08:42 PM | #16 | ||||
Mrs Russellw
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kilmore - on the road to Heathcote!
Posts: 1,363
|
Quote:
Cheers Gaela
__________________
AUSTRALIA'S QUICKEST UNOPENED N/A GT AND FIRST IN THE 11 SECONDS....................... 11.96 @ 117.88mph & 11.97 @ 118.11mph (60ft 1.69)
Quote:
|
||||
21-05-2011, 09:14 PM | #17 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Yeah sorry, it did come across perhaps in a "sharp" manner. I guess its getting annoying Ford not going all out for these types of things.
To me every little thing that is done, said, communicated etc from a business reflects that business. Now I agree these are just some harmless pics thrown out to show how much space there is, and thats fine, but to me it looks like something someone on this forum snapped up. Actually you just have to look at the photography section of this site to see members here would do far better.
__________________
|
||
21-05-2011, 09:54 PM | #18 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,223
|
Yeah I don't know what they were thinking with those pics. To call them amateurish would be an insult to an amateur.
|
||
21-05-2011, 09:59 PM | #19 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,927
|
Woulda made more sence to put 2 kids in the back and mum in the front then 2 largish dogs.
Hopefully they retail these lower end cars at a reasonable price, e.g 34 kay ish! Toyotas are rediculously expensive for what they are. |
||
21-05-2011, 10:08 PM | #20 | ||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
And those pesky Hiluxs are everywhere!
Ive been traveling past some road works for the past couple of weeks, and honestly, 95% of the cars are Hilux's, I saw one Ranger and Rodeo. worst still this is a council that has the Ford PG in its area! Getting some of that pie will be huge, councils/govs must buy a mammoth amount of these.
__________________
Last edited by Polyal; 21-05-2011 at 10:16 PM. |
||
22-05-2011, 12:00 AM | #21 | ||
Render unto Caesar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ::1
Posts: 4,229
|
I do look forward to the Ranger as I believe and hope it will take on the Hilux but these pictures released by Ford are a little unprofessional and look rushed.
Couple of issues, the dogs are unnecessary, using a clearly well used pre prod car for a media release is a little silly and the location/camera angles really don't do much.
__________________
"Aliens might be surprised to learn that in a cosmos with limitless starlight, humans kill for energy sources buried in sand." - Neil deGrasse Tyson |
||
22-05-2011, 12:11 AM | #22 | |||
Cruising...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
|
Quote:
Unless your on about a different PG. As for Hilux's, unbeleiveably astronomically overpriced....
__________________
FBT '98 BA XT '04 F100 4x4 '82 Subaru Outback '02 |
|||
22-05-2011, 12:30 AM | #23 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,374
|
Quote:
|
|||
22-05-2011, 12:43 AM | #24 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
ill tell you why the dogs is a bad idea...i have big ridgebacks and bull arabs and those in the pic made me staraight away think it was small...cus they arent big dogs....and im sure im not the only aussie with 50kg pluss dogs..lol
|
||
22-05-2011, 10:32 AM | #25 | |||
The 'Stihl' Man
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,590
|
Quote:
I think its the Ballarine shire or something, outskirts of Geelong.
__________________
|
|||
22-05-2011, 10:46 AM | #26 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
|
Will they allow suicide doors on both sides in Australia?
I recall once something about not being allowed on the drivers side due to safety reasons and would only be allowed on the passenger side?
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions?? Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole.... |
||
22-05-2011, 10:56 AM | #27 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
|
Disregard took at look at the Mazda RX8 and it has them on both sides....
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions?? Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole.... |
||
22-05-2011, 02:24 PM | #28 | |||
Cruising...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
|
Quote:
Aha massive stuff up on that one
__________________
FBT '98 BA XT '04 F100 4x4 '82 Subaru Outback '02 |
|||
22-05-2011, 02:52 PM | #29 | |||
Computer Torque Control
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ballarat East
Posts: 546
|
Quote:
|
|||
22-05-2011, 03:34 PM | #30 | |||
Cruising...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 3,819
|
Quote:
But my whole family loves my new ute. From the comfy seats to the colour to the way it drives, as a whole they all like it way better than the BF.
__________________
FBT '98 BA XT '04 F100 4x4 '82 Subaru Outback '02 |
|||