Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-02-2006, 03:57 PM   #1
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default is it worth supercharging a 6?

as the title reads... is it worth it or not?

would you see much power increase or woudl turboing be better?

sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 04:14 PM   #2
Duffman
Oh Yeah!
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 1,023
Default

I know turbo is around the 10k mark while supercharing is around the 6k mark. I have no idea which one would be better but id prefer a turbo.
__________________
Oh no! Duffman can't breath! Oh, yeah!
Duffman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 04:38 PM   #3
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

I prefer supercharging over a turbo, probably make more power with a turbo, but it dosnet mean you'll go quicker..
Aslong as you stay away from Powerdyne superchargers you'll be fine.. depends on what you want really..

Last edited by stiddy; 26-02-2006 at 04:44 PM.
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 04:40 PM   #4
svo347
AFF's 1st DM.......
 
svo347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wha???... There is only 2 states 2 be in.. WA or Drunk..
Posts: 6,200
Default

My personal pref would be Turbo
__________________
FORD GIVING POWER TO THE PEOPLE
Alloy headed 347ci EDXR8
13.21 @107.7mph
Quote:
Originally Posted by zetec
I know what lengths they go to to ensure it's more than just a Ford sticker on the part. Ford doesn't throw it's name on anything for a quick buck.
06 Turbo Terri AWD 6 sp in Neo with stuff i didnt even need, side steps,15.2 inch roof mounted DVD,Pioneer $tezza,Selby 30/18mm swaybars,debunged,100 cpsi Ballistic cat,Plazmaman under battery Cai injectors 14/lb boost,ZF tuned,Xtreme's magic. :
svo347 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 04:41 PM   #5
Laminge
Cuban... nothing like it
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Watching in amusement
Posts: 11,643
Default

I had a powerdyne on my au2xr8

Basically bolt on, unichip (use an edit) bigger injectors, and your up an away.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laminge
...its amazing how mud sticks to ones shoes, as flies do to the elderly and bottle blondes around fame and fortune...
Laminge is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 05:05 PM   #6
Rollin
Banned
 
Rollin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Smoking the bags in a Turbo 6-speed ED!
Posts: 1,208
Default

by their design V-motors lend themselves to supercharging.

turbos are easier to fit to Inline engines.

you would get more go putting a turbo on your car than a supercharger.
Rollin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 05:19 PM   #7
stockstandard
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,381
Default

Its a lot easier to get a legal supercharger setup - just talk to capa.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stiddy
Aslong as you stay away from Powerdyne superchargers you'll be fine.. depends on what you want really..
Nothing wrong with a powerdyne unless you push them for big power.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper
Yeah, the car is ugly, I can live with that.
stockstandard is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 05:33 PM   #8
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

yeah thats why I said, depends on what you want.
for a basic setup powerdyne would be fine, but if you want something decent, decent being over 200rwkw.. i would say look at a Vortech S-trim..
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 06:01 PM   #9
T3man
Banned
 
T3man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: searching for cubes
Posts: 6,672
Default

Supercharging the Ford six is very worthwhile. You can achieve about 240kW with around 8psi. Turbocharging will of course do the same.

Supercharging and turbocharging deliver power in different ways. It depends what you're looking for in driveability. Basically with a supercharger the boost builds in a linear fashion according to engine revs and so the car will drive just the way it did before but have more power throughout the rev range. It will be noticeably faster to accellerate at higher revs - you won't get that "running out of puff" feeling as you approach higher revs - the power just keeps on building.

With a turbo you can achieve much higher boost at lower revs which totally transforms the way the car drives. When it hits boost you are thrown back in the seat and the accelleration is "animal". However it puts much more stress on your drivetrain.

Turbos can be more ecomomical because it is literally "boost on demand" - regardless of the engine speed if you don't "push" the accellerator you will get "normal" engine performance and therefore "normal" fuel usage. A supercharger is boosting all the time and therefore needs extra fuel all the time. If you are prepared to potter about at low revs the supercharger will only use about 10 - 15 % more fuel than normal.

The turbo will put a lot of extra heat under the bonnet so you will have to be prepared to lag everything nearby and put lots of heat shields about the engine bay. In my own turbo 4.1 I have constant fan forced ventillation drawing out air through the inner guard.

Whichever way you go you will be VERY happy with the result I can assure you - it's like suddenly having a 50% larger capacity engine and all the fun associated with it!
T3man is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 08:08 PM   #10
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default

nice! thanks alot for the input guys.

I really dont want to go down the turbocharging road, it just seems to expensive and will most probably keep costing me with replacing parts that cant handle the abnormal power that is generated when the turbo hits.. hard.

I would rather have that power all through the rev range, rather than it coming in when it hits boost.

For 6 G's i reckon that is reasonable for a good setup that would be easy to pass all the RTA mumbo jumbo and an engineers' OK shouldnt be too hard to get, as apposed to a turbo setup.


Anyway, i will mill over this for a while, i still want to super charge my BA V8... that would be fun!

thanks
Rob
sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 09:53 PM   #11
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

I was looking at the supercharging option on LPG work work purposes.
I don't rev the guts out of the ute ... well somtimes I have to but prefer not to. Hence looking at supercharging .... also towing and heavy load driving I usually keep revs to a minimum ... i just want very low down torque ... nothing up-top.

It's a case of forking out the cash ... and the time that the vehicle needs to be off the road for install and tuning (I really can't have the ute off the road for more than 1 day due to work purposes).

But it all depends on what you want to do with it though.

My personal preference is supercharging though for the I6 auto ... if it was manual ... then yes I'd look at turbocharging.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2006, 10:16 PM   #12
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default

hmm, i used to drive a 1 tonne ute a few years ago, and i know what you mean about not being able to have the vehicle off the road for more than a day without noticing a dent in the weeks pay!

supercharging would be ideal for heavy loads, but is it really worth spending 4-6 G's on more bottom end? i know you probably arnt going to anyway.

by the way.. do you have photos of your new kit yet?????
sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 10:37 AM   #13
AnthonyQLD
Boss power
 
AnthonyQLD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,046
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfr rob
i still want to super charge my BA V8... that would be fun!
:evilking: You know you want to :
__________________
:the_finge BOSS 260+ :the_finge
AnthonyQLD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 10:40 AM   #14
Sprint347
Tickford
 
Sprint347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Windsor
Posts: 3,966
Default

with the amount of xr6-t's getting around these days i'd just wait another 12 months and snap a motor up when people start to make oopsies.

you'll probably get a motor with 50,000kms, garret turbo for the amount of money you'd spend now on a supercharger kit

my 2c
__________________
ED XR8 Sprint - 306ci SBF, GT40, Comp XE270, T5, 3.45 LSD
AU T3 TS50 - 345ci SBF, AFR 185, Comp XE274, 2800 stall, ESS LE97, 3.45 LSD
BA XT
SZ Territory TS RWD TDCi
Sprint347 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 10:51 AM   #15
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

For starters you need to define what kind of supercharger. I assume you are talking centrigual as positive displacement is a whole new ball game. Centrifugal will not 'boost' all the time like positive displacement... Its boost is completely linear...

If we're talking centrifugal i'll make another assumption and say we're talking CAPA.

If you want easy, bolt on RWKW then this is the go. I had mine up and running in about a week and that included 40+hours of time in the office.

Turbo will most likely be quicker - but more expensive, time consuming and you'll have to do a LOT more reading.

And dont believe too much anti-hype about powerdyne units. Im at around 20,000km on mine - will let you know if i have any problems but almost 2 years now and hasnt missed a beat...
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 11:19 AM   #16
Walkinshaw
Two > One
 
Walkinshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 7,063
Default

If you want to have some serious fun without the painfull lag of turbos (yes yes I know, your’s spools at 2300rpm with 5psi. Some of us want 15lb @ 900rpm), get yourself a real mans blower. Look at either an Eaton M112 with intergral bypass valve, or if you want to step right up look at getting your hands on an SRM, Whipple, Kenne Bell or Auto Rotor twin screw blower.
__________________
1978 LTD - 408ci - 11.5@120.6mph -
2004 S4 - 4.2 - M6 - quattro -

Walkinshaw is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 11:20 AM   #17
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

You're a sick man, dan. But yes... that would be unbelievable to drive!!!
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 12:03 PM   #18
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walkinshaw
If you want to have some serious fun without the painfull lag of turbos (yes yes I know, your’s spools at 2300rpm with 5psi. Some of us want 15lb @ 900rpm), get yourself a real mans blower. Look at either an Eaton M112 with intergral bypass valve, or if you want to step right up look at getting your hands on an SRM, Whipple, Kenne Bell or Auto Rotor twin screw blower.
As nice as it sounds, can it be done to a i6, without $38106713 of custom work?
has anyone done it?
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 07:55 PM   #19
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfr rob
hmm, i used to drive a 1 tonne ute a few years ago, and i know what you mean about not being able to have the vehicle off the road for more than a day without noticing a dent in the weeks pay!

supercharging would be ideal for heavy loads, but is it really worth spending 4-6 G's on more bottom end? i know you probably arnt going to anyway.

by the way.. do you have photos of your new kit yet?????
Kit goes on Mar 11 ... will have pics then.

Funny about this thread starting the other day ... I was at Cresent Motors today and was speaking to Joe about a few things (also picking up my new LPG diamond for my numberplates) ... and he asked me if i was still interested in the blower kit from Snort ... he had been speaking to them yesterday and was told that the low-PSI kit is just about ready (full kit that will bolt up without modifications at all .. drive-in drive-out ... ONE DAY).

I am now tempted again ... LOL

The kit is looking to be around the $4K mark installed ... maybe slightly less.

Will let you know when i get more info on this.

I am tempted to pay this amount for 500+Nm of rear wheel torque ... hell yes I am.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:03 PM   #20
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default

HELL yeah, that sounds interesting..

The thing is i have VERY limited knowledge about anyhting to do with turbo's or superchragers, hence my thread topic..
sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:12 PM   #21
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sfr rob
HELL yeah, that sounds interesting..

The thing is i have VERY limited knowledge about anyhting to do with turbo's or superchragers, hence my thread topic..
Same here ... hence why i speak to someone who knows ... hee hee
I'll get more detailed information as it comes to hand about this kit.
It won't be on Snort's website yet ... but it's nearing completion for public purchase ... just a case of finalising the fitting so it's an easy bolt-up .. and final testing on a test vehicle.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:14 PM   #22
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default

and it is compatible with LPG yes?????????
sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:22 PM   #23
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

Yes indeedy ... just needs to change the way the converter works when it sees boost though ... that's the only thing that needs working on afterwards (Joe has fixed this before on a turbo LPG Falcon though ... so it's not a real issue).
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:27 PM   #24
Baboon_AU
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Baboon_AU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 570
Default

superchargers and turbos but 60% more wear on your engine remember..
__________________
01 AUII XLS Regency Red Ute 4.0L Egas Auto
Mods -transcooler, tickford intake, K&N pod filter, Pacemakers, 2.5 inch exhaust, Crow Cam,

1981 XD Fairmont 351 - 351 Cleveland, ARP bolts, flat top pistons, Stage 3 Dynotec cam, ported 2V heads with 4V valves, Roller Rockers, Weiand manifold, Mighty Demon, 1/2" fuel lines with blue Holley fuel pump, Crane hi-6 ignition, B&M megashifter, C4, hi-stall, shift kit, 3.77 Ford 9" LSD.

Thanks to: EvilChief and SJW Performance
Baboon_AU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:28 PM   #25
jonbays
TL40 Wagon?
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
Default

I reckon the supercharger is easier to fit and get a engineers certificate for and thats a good start. Powerwise it's good maybe not as good as a turbo but close and a nice flat power curve with power everywhere which is good for street. You see powerdynes low prssure gear giving 160 odd rwkw and up to 180rwkw with pretty stock engines without any huge spend. If you want to rebuild the engine from scratch 240rwkw is possible but for that spend you could buy a S/H BA XR6T anyway!

Truth is saving your dough to buy an XR6T is the better option.
jonbays is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 08:33 PM   #26
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

I am after the low-boost option ... just for better low-down torque ... hence why I think S/C is better for that reason ... the kit I am after does not need a cooler either ... so no extra plumbing needed either.

Jonbays .. I was told about the 150rwkw mark for the EGAS engine ... but I am more interested in the torque figure though ... I don't want to rev the motor out anyway and I am not interested in racing either.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 09:14 PM   #27
sfr rob
○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ ○○○○○
 
sfr rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,954
Default

Jonbays... i here ya mate..
thats why i went and bought a V8.. hehehehe
sfr rob is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 11:21 PM   #28
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

But not everyone wants to go and buy a BA XR6T as the alternative, actually getting sick of hearing it "why dont you just buy a XR6T" or "why dont you just buy a V8"

whats wrong with keeping and working with what you have?

I think an s/c I6 AU that you've built would be better than any BA XR6T, may not be as fast, but still it will be worth more to you, knowing that you built it, spent the time and money on it.. and it wont be just another generic car on the road.

and a 13second AU is more impressive then a 12second BA XR6T. A 13second AU takes ALOT more then a drive in drive out 12second off the shelf kit..
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 11:27 PM   #29
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

I'd love an XR6T ... but they don't make them on LPG.
Actually there is no boosted LPG vehicle that Ford make.
For work I really do need to run an LPG vehicle ... otherwise it's not worth doing courier work on petrol.

I am trying to do mods that will benefit my work (and play as well) ... also if something does go bang ... AU motors are much cheaper to come by than BA engines.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2006, 11:35 PM   #30
stiddy
Banned
 
stiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
Default

Im not knocking the BA's they are a fine car, but its just getting over the top with people saying if you want to go hard the only option is to get a XR6T..

Id say whack a blower onto an AU, and be happy.. and you will be..
stiddy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL